AI 驱动 · 全球签证与身份规划,10 分钟出方案,全程匿名
Plan, prepare, and file your visa application in one place
规划、准备、递交一站完成
AllPass lays out the full path,
every milestone, every cost, every timeline,
nothing buried in fine print
AllPass 把完整路径摊开,
每一个节点、每一笔费用、每一段时间,
没有藏在细则里的东西
Research, drafting, filing,
AllPass handles it all,
every decision is yours
研究、起草、递交,由 AllPass 处理,
每一个决定,由你做出
Export your plan and file it yourself,
the work belongs to you
想自己递交?
随时导出方案,工作属于你
无需提供任何个人身份信息,AI 实时分析,10 分钟内给出完整方案
No personal ID needed — AI analyzes in real time, delivers a full plan in under 10 minutes
你好!我将通过几个问题了解你的情况,帮你定制最适合的申请方案 Hello! I'll ask a few questions to understand your situation and create the best application plan for you
你的项目大概有多少 Star?有没有被企业或学术机构采用? How many stars does your project have? Has it been adopted by enterprises or academic institutions?
您目前的条件,直接申请EB-1A(杰出人才)有风险,但完全有希望。 核心策略是:主攻EB-1A,同时用NIW(国家利益豁免)当保底方案。您有论文、专利和审稿经验,这是非常好的基础。现在要做的,不是证明您是“世界第一”,而是证明您是“领域内正在快速上升的顶尖新星”,并且您的工作对美国有好处。
With your current profile, applying directly for EB-1A carries risk, but it is absolutely possible. The core strategy is to make EB-1A the primary path, while using NIW as the backup route. You already have papers, patents, and peer-review experience, which is a strong foundation. The goal is not to prove that you are “number one in the world,” but to show that you are a fast-rising top contributor in your field and that your work benefits the United States.
您好,您是一位在科研/学术领域有初步积累的研究人员。您的核心优势在于拥有论文发表、论文被引用、担任审稿人和发明专利这四项硬性成果,这为您申请美国职业移民绿卡打下了基础。您选择的路径是 EB-1A 杰出人才移民,这个签证是给在科学、艺术、教育、商业或体育领域拥有“顶尖水平”的外国人直接申请美国永久居民身份(绿卡)的通道,最大的好处是不需要美国雇主担保,自己就能申请,而且排期(等待时间)非常短。
您的总体策略是:以 EB-1A 为主攻方向,同时将 NIW(国家利益豁免)作为稳妥的备选方案。虽然您目前没有国家级或国际级奖项,但通过深度挖掘和完善您已有的论文、专利和审稿经历,并借助强有力的专家推荐信来证明您的工作对美国国家利益的重要性,您完全有希望满足 EB-1A 的“十项标准中的三项”。我们的目标是,让移民局看到您虽然年轻,但已经展现出成为领域内顶尖人才的潜力。
EB-1A 的核心门槛是证明您是您所在领域内少数位于金字塔顶端的杰出人才。移民局不看您的学历或工作年限,而是看您是否满足 10 项标准中的至少 3 项。这 10 项标准是移民局用来判断“杰出”的客观证据清单。
以下是针对您背景的逐条分析:
| 条件/标准 | 通俗解释(一句话说清楚什么意思) | 您已有的证据 | 还差什么 / 建议补强 | 难度评估 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. 获得国家级或国际级奖项 | 证明您的成就被权威机构认可,比如“国家科技进步奖”或“XX国际学术会议最佳论文奖”。 | 无 | 这是您最明显的短板。建议您: 1. 梳理您是否获得过省级、市级或校级的科研奖项,这些可以作为“其他类似证据”提交。 2. 关注您所在领域的国际学术会议,争取获得“最佳论文”或“青年科学家”等奖项。 | 高 |
| 2. 专业协会会员资格 | 证明您被同行认可,有资格加入需要杰出成就才能加入的专业协会。 | 无 | 建议您申请加入您所在领域的国际或国家级专业学会,例如: - IEEE(电气电子工程师学会) - ACM(美国计算机协会) - 中国化学会等。很多学会有“高级会员”或“会士”级别,这些更能体现您的杰出性。 | 中 |
| 3. 被专业或主流媒体报道 | 证明您的成就被第三方媒体或专业刊物报道过,说明您的工作有影响力。 | 无 | 这是您需要重点补强的一环。请仔细回忆: 1. 您的研究成果是否被大学官网、科研机构官网、行业新闻网站报道过? 2. 您是否接受过专业杂志、播客或行业自媒体的采访? 3. 您的专利是否被科技类媒体报道过? 注意: 我们只基于您已有的真实报道进行分析,不要为了申请而主动制造报道。 | 中 |
| 4. 担任过评审/审稿人 | 证明您被同行视为专家,有资格评判他人的工作。 | 您担任过 1-5 篇审稿 | 这是您的优势之一。建议您: 1. 扩大审稿范围:主动向更多您研究领域的期刊或会议申请成为审稿人。 2. 保留所有审稿邀请函和完成证明,这是最直接的证据。 | 低 |
| 5. 原创性科学、学术或艺术贡献 | 证明您的工作对领域有实质性、原创性的贡献。这是 EB-1A 的核心。 | 您发表了 1-5 篇论文,拥有 1-3 个发明专利 | 这是您的主攻方向。需要将您的贡献“故事化”: 1. 论文:重点不是数量,而是被谁引用。找出引用您论文的知名机构(如MIT、斯坦福)、知名学者或重要专利,证明您的工作影响了他们。 2. 专利:证明您的专利已经商业化(被公司购买、授权使用)或有巨大的应用潜力。提供专利许可协议、产品照片、公司证明信等。 3. 专家推荐信:让独立专家在信中详细说明您的论文或专利如何推动了领域发展。 | 中 |
| 6. 在专业或主流期刊发表学术文章 | 证明您的研究成果被同行评议并公开发表。 | 您发表了 1-5 篇学术论文 | 这是您的优势之一。请整理好所有论文的首页、摘要、作者列表,以及期刊的影响因子和排名。如果您的论文被SCI、EI 等权威数据库收录,请提供检索证明。 | 低 |
| 7. 作品在艺术展览或展示中被展出 | 主要适用于艺术类申请人。 | 不适用 | 您从事科研/学术领域,此项不适用。 | 不适用 |
| 8. 在知名组织或机构中担任领导或关键角色 | 证明您在团队或项目中发挥了核心作用。 | 无 | 建议您: 1. 梳理您是否担任过项目负责人、课题组长、实验室主管等职务。 2. 提供项目立项书、结题报告、任命文件等,证明您的领导角色。 3. 如果您的专利是第一发明人,这本身就是一种关键角色的体现。 | 中 |
| 9. 获得高薪或显著高于同行的报酬 | 证明您的价值被市场认可,获得了远超同行的薪酬。 | 无 | 如果您目前收入不高,此项很难满足。可以尝试提供未来美国雇主的高薪 Offer 作为替代证据。 | 高 |
| 10. 在表演艺术领域取得商业成功 | 主要适用于表演艺术领域(如演员、歌手、导演)。 | 不适用 | 您从事科研/学术领域,此项不适用。 | 不适用 |
以下是您需要准备的所有证据材料清单,按类别划分,每项都说明了具体操作步骤。
| 材料名称 | 这是什么(大白话解释) | 为什么需要它 | 去哪里/怎么拿到它 | 难度和优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 论文全文及检索证明 | 您发表的所有论文的完整PDF文件,以及证明这些论文被权威数据库收录的官方文件。 | 证明您的研究成果是公开发表、经过同行评议的。 | 1. 论文全文:从期刊官网或知网等数据库下载。 2. 检索证明:去您大学或研究所的图书馆,申请开具“论文收录及引用检索报告”。这是官方文件,非常关键。 | 低 / 最高优先级 |
| 引用分析报告 | 一份详细列出所有引用您论文的文献列表,并分析引用来源的权威性。 | 证明您的工作被同行关注和认可,尤其是被顶尖机构或知名学者引用。 | 1. 使用 Google Scholar 或 Web of Science 等工具,生成您的论文被引列表。 2. 手动筛选出重要的引用:来自世界排名前100的大学、领域内大牛、重要专利的引用。 3. 将这些重要引用高亮标注,并准备一份引用摘要,用中文解释这些引用如何证明了您工作的价值。 | 中 / 最高优先级 |
| 专利证书及商业化证明 | 您的发明专利的授权证书,以及证明该专利被实际使用或具有巨大商业价值的文件。 | 证明您的原创性贡献不仅停留在理论,还有实际应用价值。 | 1. 专利证书:从国家知识产权局官网下载。 2. 商业化证明:如果专利已转让或许可,提供转让/许可协议;如果被公司使用,提供公司出具的证明信,说明该专利如何被用于其产品或技术中。 | 中 / 高优先级 |
| 材料名称 | 这是什么(大白话解释) | 为什么需要它 | 去哪里/怎么拿到它 | 难度和优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 审稿邀请函和完成证明 | 期刊或会议发给您的审稿邀请邮件,以及您完成审稿后收到的确认函或感谢信。 | 直接证明您被同行视为专家,有资格评判他人的工作。 | 1. 整理邮箱:搜索关键词“review”、“审稿”、“referee”。 2. 截图或导出所有相关邮件,包括邀请函和完成确认函。 3. 如果期刊有审稿人系统,可以截图您的审稿人主页。 | 低 / 高优先级 |
| 媒体报道材料 | 任何第三方媒体或专业刊物对您或您工作的报道。 | 证明您的工作引起了公众或业界的关注。 | 1. 仔细回忆:您的研究是否被大学官网、科研机构官网、行业新闻网站、专业杂志报道过? 2. 搜索:用您的名字和研究关键词在百度、Google上搜索。 3. 如果找到,保存完整的报道页面(截图或PDF),并注明媒体名称和报道日期。 | 中 / 中优先级 |
| 材料名称 | 这是什么(大白话解释) | 为什么需要它 | 去哪里/怎么拿到它 | 难度和优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 专家推荐信 | 由领域内权威专家撰写的信件,从第三方角度评价您的杰出贡献。 | 这是EB-1A申请中最重要的证据之一,可以弥补奖项等硬性条件的不足。 | 1. 选择推荐人:建议 5-7 封。其中至少 3 位是独立推荐人(与您没有合作或师生关系,只是了解您的工作)。 2. 推荐人来源:您的博士导师、合作者、引用您论文的知名学者、您审稿的期刊主编、您专利的商业合作伙伴。 3. 如何联系:礼貌地发送邮件,说明您正在申请美国杰出人才绿卡,希望他能为您写一封推荐信,并附上您的简历和主要成果摘要。 💡 推荐信的起草和格式化可联系 ALLPASS 专家 协助完成,确保信件内容精准地指向EB-1A的每一条标准。 | 高 / 最高优先级 |
推荐信是您申请材料的灵魂,它能把您零散的证据串联成一个有力的故事。我们建议您准备 5-7 封推荐信,其中独立推荐人(与您没有直接利益关系)不少于 3 位。
| 编号 | 推荐人角色 | 与您的关系 | 证明哪项条件 | 优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 您的博士导师 | 导师-学生关系 | 证明您的原创性贡献(第5条)、领导角色(第8条)和研究潜力。 | 最高 |
| 2 | 一位引用您论文的知名学者 | 独立推荐人 | 证明您的工作对领域内其他研究者产生了实质性影响(第5条)。 | 最高 |
| 3 | 您审稿的期刊主编 | 独立推荐人 | 证明您被同行认可为领域专家(第4条)。 | 高 |
| 4 | 您专利的商业合作伙伴或公司负责人 | 独立推荐人 | 证明您的专利具有商业价值或应用前景(第5条)。 | 高 |
| 5 | 您所在研究机构的负责人或系主任 | 上下级关系 | 证明您在机构中的关键角色(第8条)和工作价值。 | 中 |
| 6 | 一位与您合作过的领域内专家 | 合作者 | 从合作角度证明您的专业能力和贡献(第5条)。 | 中 |
| 7 | 一位您论文的同行评议者 | 独立推荐人 | 从同行评议的角度,证明您论文的质量和原创性(第5条)。 | 中 |
💡 推荐信的起草和格式化可联系 ALLPASS 专家 协助完成。
You are an early-stage researcher in a scientific or academic field. Your strongest assets are published papers, citations, peer-review experience, and invention patents. These give you a foundation for an employment-based U.S. green card strategy. The selected path is EB-1A Extraordinary Ability, a category for foreign nationals who can show top-level ability in science, art, education, business, or athletics. Its major advantage is that no U.S. employer sponsorship is required, and the waiting time can be very short.
The overall strategy is to treat EB-1A as the primary path, with NIW as a steadier backup route. Although you do not currently have national or international awards, your existing papers, patents, and reviewing experience can be developed into a persuasive record. Strong expert letters can also explain why your work matters to the United States. The goal is to help immigration officers see that, although you are still early in your career, you already show the potential to become a top contributor in your field.
The key EB-1A threshold is proving that you are among the small percentage at the very top of your field. USCIS does not simply look at degrees or years of work. It looks at whether you satisfy at least 3 of the 10 regulatory criteria.
Below is a criterion-by-criterion analysis based on your background:
| Criterion | Plain-English meaning | Your current evidence | What to strengthen | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Nationally or internationally recognized prizes | Evidence that an authoritative body recognized your achievements, such as a national science award or a best-paper award at an international conference. | None | This is the clearest gap. Review whether you have any provincial, city-level, or university-level research awards that can be submitted as comparable evidence. Also watch for international academic conferences where you may compete for best-paper or young-scholar awards. | High |
| 2. Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement | Evidence that peers recognize you enough for admission into selective professional associations. | None | Consider applying to international or national professional societies in your field, such as IEEE, ACM, or relevant national academies and societies. Senior-member or fellow-level membership is stronger than ordinary membership. | Medium |
| 3. Published material about you or your work | Third-party media or professional publications have covered you or your work. | None | Recall whether your research was covered by university websites, research institutions, industry news outlets, professional magazines, podcasts, or technical media. Use only real, independent coverage; do not create coverage just for the application. | Medium |
| 4. Judging the work of others | Evidence that peers view you as qualified to evaluate other people’s work. | You have completed 1-5 peer reviews. | This is one of your strengths. Expand your reviewing activity by applying to more journals or conferences in your field, and keep every review invitation and completion confirmation. | Low |
| 5. Original scientific, scholarly, or artistic contributions | Evidence that your work made a substantial original contribution to the field. This is the core of the case. | You have 1-5 papers and 1-3 invention patents. | This should be the main focus. Show who cited your papers, especially respected institutions, well-known scholars, or important patents. For patents, show commercialization, licensing, product use, or strong application potential. Independent expert letters should explain how your work moved the field forward. | Medium |
| 6. Authorship of scholarly articles | Your research has been peer-reviewed and published in professional or major publications. | You have published 1-5 scholarly papers. | This is another strength. Collect each paper’s first page, abstract, author list, journal impact factor, ranking, and database indexing proof if available. | Low |
| 7. Artistic exhibitions or showcases | Mainly applies to artists and creative professionals. | Not applicable | You are in a research/academic field, so this criterion is not applicable. | Not applicable |
| 8. Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations | Evidence that you played a core role in a team, lab, project, or organization. | None | Review whether you have served as a project lead, research group lead, lab coordinator, or first inventor. Project approvals, completion reports, appointment records, and first-inventor patent records may help. | Medium |
| 9. High salary or remuneration | Evidence that the market recognizes your value through compensation significantly above peers. | None | If current income is not high, this criterion is difficult. A future high-salary U.S. offer may sometimes support the point. | High |
| 10. Commercial success in the performing arts | Mainly applies to performers, singers, directors, and similar roles. | Not applicable | You are in a research/academic field, so this criterion is not applicable. | Not applicable |
Below is the evidence plan, grouped by category. Each item explains what it is and how to obtain it.
| Material | What it is | Why it matters | Where / how to obtain it | Difficulty / priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full papers and indexing proof | Complete PDFs of your published papers, plus official proof that they were indexed by authoritative databases. | Shows that your research was publicly published and peer reviewed. | Download papers from journal websites or databases. Ask your university or institute library for a paper indexing and citation report; this official document is especially important. | Low / highest priority |
| Citation analysis report | A detailed list of works citing your papers, with analysis of the authority of those sources. | Shows that peers have noticed and used your work, especially if citations come from top institutions or well-known scholars. | Use Google Scholar or Web of Science, manually highlight important citations from top universities, leading scholars, or important patents, and prepare a short explanation of why those citations matter. | Medium / highest priority |
| Patent certificates and commercialization proof | Your granted patent certificates and documents showing real use or commercial value. | Shows that your original contribution has practical value, not only theoretical value. | Download patent certificates from the official patent office. If the patent was licensed or transferred, provide agreements. If a company uses it, obtain a company letter explaining how the patent is used. | Medium / high priority |
| Material | What it is | Why it matters | Where / how to obtain it | Difficulty / priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review invitations and completion proof | Journal or conference review invitations, plus confirmation or thank-you letters after completion. | Directly proves that peers view you as qualified to judge other work. | Search your email for “review,” “referee,” or similar terms. Export or screenshot invitations and completion confirmations. If the journal has a reviewer portal, save screenshots of your reviewer profile. | Low / high priority |
| Media coverage materials | Third-party media or professional publication coverage of you or your work. | Shows public or industry attention to your work. | Search your name and research keywords. Save complete pages as screenshots or PDFs, including media name and publication date. | Medium / medium priority |
| Material | What it is | Why it matters | Where / how to obtain it | Difficulty / priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert recommendation letters | Letters from respected experts evaluating your contributions from a third-party perspective. | One of the most important EB-1A evidence types, especially when awards or other hard indicators are limited. | Prepare 5-7 letters, including at least 3 independent recommenders. Potential sources include your PhD advisor, collaborators, scholars who cited your work, journal editors, or patent-related business partners. ALLPASS experts can help structure letters so they map precisely to EB-1A criteria. | High / highest priority |
Recommendation letters connect scattered evidence into a persuasive story. We recommend preparing 5-7 letters, with at least 3 independent recommenders.
| # | Recommender role | Relationship | What it supports | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Your PhD advisor | Advisor-student | Original contributions, critical role, and research potential. | Highest |
| 2 | A well-known scholar who cited your paper | Independent recommender | Impact on other researchers in the field. | Highest |
| 3 | Editor of a journal you reviewed for | Independent recommender | Recognition as a field expert. | High |
| 4 | Patent business partner or company lead | Independent recommender | Commercial value or application potential of the patent. | High |
| 5 | Head of your institution or department | Supervisor | Critical role and value of your work within the institution. | Medium |
| 6 | A field expert who collaborated with you | Collaborator | Professional ability and contribution. | Medium |
| 7 | A peer reviewer of your paper | Independent recommender | Quality and originality of your research. | Medium |
💡 ALLPASS experts can help draft and format recommendation letters.
共 4 份文件,可预览或下载4 files available to preview or download
共 16 项,请按以下分类逐一准备16 items total, organized by source
Weeks of back-and-forth before you get a plan
材料的准备办理周期长
Research, drafting, strategy—done in 10 minutes
研究、起草、出策划案——10 分钟内完成
Layered markups, hidden fees
中间环节多,价格不透明
We work directly at the source—no middlemen, no markups. You pay for the work itself
原价对接。项目直连源头,去掉中间环节。按工作本身计价
Consultant quality varies wildly; outcomes are hard to predict
经验无法累积,办理水平参差不齐
Every plan fits your background, goals, and pace
每一份方案都贴合你的背景、目标与节奏
You don't know how long your data is kept, or who sees it
客户信息在人手,人员流动信息泄露
Deleted the moment your case ends. Delete anytime, for any reason
案件一结束立即删除。任何时候、任何理由,你都可以删除
Putting you in control isn't just a feature — it's our entire blueprint
将选择权交还给你,是我们构建这个平台的初衷
你好!很高兴为你服务,请留下联系方式,我们的专家团队会尽快与你沟通 Hello! Glad to assist — please leave your contact info and our expert team will reach out soon